This forum is for all the topics that don't fit anywhere else. Post anything from Hello's to Web Links.
 #114803  by TheDoctor
 
so yea i want a new computer and i was wanting to hear yalls ruff estimation on what fps would be like on MC, JKA, and games like that so here are the specs of the computer im looking to buy what do you think guys and girls?


General Spec

Brand
Avatar

Model
Gaming FX6164

Type
Gaming & Entertainment

Form Factor
Tower

Usage
Consumer

Colors
Black

Processor
AMD FX-6100 3.3GHz

Processor Main Features
64 bit Six-Core Processor

Cache Per Processor
6MB L2 Cache

Memory
16GB DDR3 1600

Hard Drive
1TB SATA III 7200RPM

Optical Drive 1
24X DL DVD+/-RW Drive

Graphics
NVIDIA Geforce GT 640 2GB

Ethernet
Gigabit Ethernet

Power Supply
450W

Operating System
Windows 8 64-Bit

Motherboard

Chipset
AMD 760G

CPU

CPU Type
AMD FX-Series

CPU Speed
FX-6100(3.3GHz)

L2 Cache Per CPU
6MB

L3 Cache Per CPU
8MB

CPU Socket Type
AM3+

CPU Main Features
64 bit Six-Core Processor

Graphics

GPU/VPU Type
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 2GB

Memory

Memory Capacity
16GB DDR3

Memory Speed
DDR3 1600

Hard Drive

HDD Capacity
1TB

HDD Interface
SATA III

HDD RPM
7200rpm

Optical Drive

Optical Drive Type
DVD±RW

Optical Drive Spec
24X DL DVD+/-RW Drive

Communications

LAN Speed
10/100/1000Mbps

Mouse

Mouse Type
USB Mouse

Keyboard

Keyboard Type
USB Keyboard



the mouse doesnt really matter but what FPS do you think id get?
oh and its $629.99 with $9.99 shipping so is it a ripoff or a good deal?

 #114805  by Jato
 
Y no build your own?

 #114806  by Kane
 
decent typically priced for an already built unit.

You will be looking at mid to high range FPS on 2013 games so MC and JKA will play more than adequatly. JKA throttles FPS anyways but you will have goo enough FPS to play Crysis 3 MP on max settings if you want a benchmark.

The only negatives are the processor is a middling spec and would throttle any higher GPU you decided to put it, thus why they have probably stuck with a 640.

Oh and you could build the same system for much much less if you built it yourself rough estimate 30% - 40% drop in price depending on where you shop

 #114809  by John
 
What Kane said. That should be more than adequate to play MC and JKA

 #114894  by TheDoctor
 
yea but thing is its for my whole family to use (which is pretty small now since all my brothers and my sister have moved out except for me and my bro and lol my mom and dad)so my brother said he didnt want me to build a computer unless i had a degree in computers lol thats why i want to get this one and im not to computer savvy since one time i tried to take out the RAM sticks and ended up taking out the video card lol that was a long time ago and ive learned since then.I prob could do it if i got one of my brothers to help (specificly the one that got a degree in computer science and has built his own computer lol)

 #114895  by Jato
 
TheDoctor wrote: one time i tried to take out the RAM sticks and ended up taking out the video card lol
...... oh Doc.... lmao

Anyways then what ur looking it is lol and will b more than adequate for jka and mc like theyre saying

 #114908  by Necros
 
Jato wrote: Anyways then what ur looking it is lol and will b more than adequate for jka and mc like theyre saying
Well, I can freely say that it will be more than adequate for MC. However, I wouldn't be so sure about JKA. This however isn't the hardware's fault, as with my PC I can blow Minecraft away with 150 fps and the draw distance turned onto very far and all that, and some days struggle to even get 30 fps on JKA. You have to remember that my machine is built with the ability to get 60 fps on Ultra settings on most modern games with VSync on.

However, JKA from the way I see it was pretty terribly designed and actually doesn't handle new hardware very well because of this. So, you can put as much power into your machine as you want, but JKA won't get any better from it :\

 #114910  by Jato
 
Necros wrote:
Jato wrote: Anyways then what ur looking it is lol and will b more than adequate for jka and mc like theyre saying
Well, I can freely say that it will be more than adequate for MC. However, I wouldn't be so sure about JKA. This however isn't the hardware's fault, as with my PC I can blow Minecraft away with 150 fps and the draw distance turned onto very far and all that, and some days struggle to even get 30 fps on JKA. You have to remember that my machine is built with the ability to get 60 fps on Ultra settings on most modern games with VSync on.

However, JKA from the way I see it was pretty terribly designed and actually doesn't handle new hardware very well because of this. So, you can put as much power into your machine as you want, but JKA won't get any better from it :\
Really? I dont have this issue, altho my hardware is prolly due for an update

 #114914  by Zabuza
 
TheDoctor wrote: Operating System
Windows 8 64-Bit
My heart disconnected from my arteries and other vessels, diamond pickaxed out of my ribcage, used a plastic spoon to dig through my skin, watched my Little Ponies, splashed in a mud puddle, climbed a 20ft ladder, jumped into a bbq, got grilled, served on a bun, dog ate the heartburger, dog had bowel issues, and the remains of my heart came out the south end hours later after seeing Windows 8. To ease the pain of my heart, please use win7.

 #114915  by Aventador
 
Well I just bought an iMac and windows 7 to use on bootcamp so I got the best of both worlds :)

 #114916  by Jato
 
Zabuza wrote:
TheDoctor wrote: Operating System
Windows 8 64-Bit
My heart disconnected from my arteries and other vessels, diamond pickaxed out of my ribcage, used a plastic spoon to dig through my skin, watched my Little Ponies, splashed in a mud puddle, climbed a 20ft ladder, jumped into a bbq, got grilled, served on a bun, dog ate the heartburger, dog had bowel issues, and the remains of my heart came out the south end hours later after seeing Windows 8. To ease the pain of my heart, please use win7.
LOL but hes right

 #114917  by Creed
 
I like Windows 8 lol

 #114918  by Jato
 
Creed wrote:I like Windows 8 lol
HEATHEN!

 #114919  by Necros
 
Jato wrote:
Creed wrote:I like Windows 8 lol
HEATHEN!
Except for the fact that Windows 8 isn't that bad? I have to use it on my PC at work, and it's honestly not too terrible. Yes, it is lamentable that there is no longer a start menu packaged with the OS, but you can get third party software to remedy that, such as Classic Shell. On top of that, it has a less flashy UI and much faster boot time, making it a faster OS overall than Windows 7.

I know Windows 7 is a great OS, and I personally am not gonna just rush out to upgrade until Windows 9, but that does not mean that there aren't strengths to Windows 8 and should be hated just for hating's sake. It's an experiment that didn't pan out the right way, and I hope that they are able to find a happy medium when it comes to Windows 9.

 #114920  by TheDoctor
 
yea and i decided if i dont like it i heard you can spend $3 and get something thats exactly like windows 7 just with faster start up so no problems there :D

 #114921  by Jato
 
Necros wrote:
Jato wrote:
Creed wrote:I like Windows 8 lol
HEATHEN!
Except for the fact that Windows 8 isn't that bad? I have to use it on my PC at work, and it's honestly not too terrible. Yes, it is lamentable that there is no longer a start menu packaged with the OS, but you can get third party software to remedy that, such as Classic Shell. On top of that, it has a less flashy UI and much faster boot time, making it a faster OS overall than Windows 7.

I know Windows 7 is a great OS, and I personally am not gonna just rush out to upgrade until Windows 9, but that does not mean that there aren't strengths to Windows 8 and should be hated just for hating's sake. It's an experiment that didn't pan out the right way, and I hope that they are able to find a happy medium when it comes to Windows 9.
I have 3 OS's, vista 7 and 8. In my experience 7 is the best and 8 rly isnt faster. If anything it freezes more and is a complete pain to find anything from word to files i dont use as often. If you love apps and a million desktop icons so you dont have to hunt for less used files then by all means use 8. And my 8 is my newest addition to the family.

However this is just my humble opinion. Take it with a grain of salt. Do what YOU want, if you know you like 8 then by all means be a heathen... but be a happy heathen :)

 #114922  by Key
 
Jato wrote:Really? I dont have this issue
neither do I, and it's strange how graphics cards like to work their way around older games. I don't think it's JKA's fault that it was written with a QA3 engine, but I know a few of my old highschool friends (who always had better computers than me) did complain about playing JKA. Not necessarily a constant FPS loss, but during certain points of rendering or drawing. Which is why none of them played it with me :( But hey, the openJK team was looking for ways to improve the graphics (by implementing a new engine I think?) and optimize better for high performance systems.

Anyways, that's besides the point. That 640 sounds quite nice... I was thinking about upgrading, but $$ is an issue... and I'd have to buy a bigger / fatter power supply. So there's a handful of things I'd be looking into.

Correct me if I'm wrong, because I have no idea, but don't some games have compatibility issues with Windows 8? Again, I feel like I'm terribly wrong about this... but I can't recall if my neighbor was complaining about Windows 8 for some game, or some version of w/e else.

 #114924  by TheDoctor
 
yea like windows 8 was a test so was vista and then windows 7 came out and it was awesome and vista :/ not so great...imagine what windows 9 is gonna be like :D

 #114925  by TheDoctor
 
so just found another computer and its $649.99 but here are the specs



AMD FX-Series FX-8320(3.50GHz) eight cores
8GB DDR3 2TB HDD Capacity
Windows 8 64-Bit
AMD Radeon HD 7770 1GB

so what do you think should i go with spending more money and getting a better processor or just stay with the awesome RAM and graphics card?

 #114926  by Aventador
 
Personally I like intel processors... But idk if that would be too much

 #114927  by Jato
 
Ive had a great experience with gecorce cards so naturally i recommemd them. Just make sure u have a power source that can handle them and a surge protector otherwise u can fry yours like i fried mine ;_;

 #114928  by TheDoctor
 
ok i was thinking it was ridiculous to buld a computer till i saw this
(video card) (CPU) (RAM)
ASUS GeForce GTX660 Ti 2GB, AMD 8 Core FX Zambezi 3.6GHz, G.SKILL 16GB MEM, ASUS AM3+ Motherboard. and all this costs $589.99

i figure the only thing that ill need is a power supply,HDD,sound card,and case with fans which im not actually gonna get serious about this unless the price is still under $700 and ive got the whole thing figured out XD.so tell me if you think with all the other things (including operating system) what you think this would cost

 #114931  by Kane
 
To be honest for what you wanted the first one was more than adequate. With building a PC from scratch unless you get an already seated and set up processor motherboard package you'll still have to setup all the BIOS settings and everything that goes with that. Its not difficult but it does require research and you can quite easily make your CPU unusable if you don't take precautions.

In answer to the earlier point about struggling with FPS in JKA.. its a game engine optimisation issue so not alot of chance to fix it... I mean its a very old game now. Lots of older games didnt even give you the chance to put vsynch on it was automatically enabled.

I get 50fps and im running an i7 and two gtx 660ti's.(which gives me 240+ FPS in most games released recently)

It will be cheaper to build yes... but if you just want an easy setup and something stable for the whole family that you don't really intend to dedicate to gaming go for one of your packages... but yeah Windows 8 is horrible... I would stick with Win 7 if at all possible. (but thats just my personal aesthetic opinion)

 #114933  by TheDoctor
 
thx kane but i kinda plan on being a computer programmer when i grow up so...my mind can sometimes wander lol ill stick with the original

 #114935  by Jato
 
TheDoctor wrote:thx kane but i kinda plan on being a computer programmer when i grow up so...my mind can sometimes wander lol ill stick with the original
Best plan buddy. Theres no shame in not inderstanding it yet, i would still consider myself a neophyte when it comes to building pcs and i have very little understanding of programming (lol ask jaw) the only diff is a lot of my frienda and families are techy's so it usually isnt hard to get an answer for what i dont know.... until i go to college i which case my friends are bigger pc noobs than me D:

All in all your plan A is the best for you